I keep wondering why, in the text, Frankenstein's monster is referred to as a male. If something was sewn together from different body parts, how could it be considered a male, or even a female? It's a "thing," right? Victor first described his creation as an "it," then in the next paragraph, "it" has a gender. Did Victor always want a son? Or does it have something to do with the stereotype that males are more evil than women? Now Frankenstein is a story about sexism! Kidding.
I was discussing Frankenstein with a friend from high school, and he mentioned that the "monster" is actually a "golem." According to Hebrew lore, a golem is a being of clay given life, like how Prometheus molded humans out of clay. So Frankenstein's "monster" is a mockery of life in a sense. As we were discussing in class, the monster can never be a human.
Btw, did anyone ever watch that one movie with Rob Shneider? He was sewn back together using animal parts. So he was able to run as fast as a horse, jump as high as a rabbit, and he was horny for a goat. We should watch that movie in class.
How long do these blogs have to be anyway? Peace be with you =]
Blog Archive
-
►
2008
(1)
- 09/28 - 10/05 (1)
-
▼
2007
(134)
- 12/09 - 12/16 (3)
- 12/02 - 12/09 (13)
- 11/25 - 12/02 (26)
- 11/18 - 11/25 (1)
- 11/11 - 11/18 (6)
- 11/04 - 11/11 (6)
- 10/28 - 11/04 (5)
- 10/21 - 10/28 (11)
- 10/14 - 10/21 (11)
- 10/07 - 10/14 (10)
- 09/30 - 10/07 (9)
- 09/23 - 09/30 (8)
- 09/09 - 09/16 (12)
- 09/02 - 09/09 (13)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment